Skip to main content
Home  >  Recent Settlements  >  RAM  >  2025 Ram 1500 — Arizona
✦ Case Study: Resolved
$21,000 Cash and Keep
Results may vary. Prior outcomes do not guarantee a similar result. Each case is unique and depends on its specific facts and applicable law.

2025 Ram 1500 Lemon Law Case Study: Cash and Keep Settlement in Arizona

Purchased New in Arizona
$21,000
Recovered
6 Visits
Repair Attempts
45 Days
Out of Service
2,251 Mi
At First Repair
Case Overview

2025 Ram 1500 Repair Record: 6 Visits, 45 Days Off the Road

2025 Ram 1500 lemon law cash-and-keep settlement in Arizona: Easy Lemon recovered $21,000 for this client after 6 repair visits and 45 days out of service. The claim was brought under Arizona Lemon Law (Ariz. Rev. Stat. §44-1261 to §44-1267). When the same defect keeps coming back and the manufacturer cannot fix it, the owner may be entitled to a buyback, a replacement or a cash settlement, at no cost†.

This Ram 1500 went back to the dealer 6 times because of issues logged under engine, electrical and fuel. Our client bought it new in Arizona, and the dealer held it for a total of 45 days. The odometer read 2,251 miles at the first repair.

Easy Lemon pressed the claim with Ram, which agreed to a cash-and-keep settlement worth $21,000. The amount combines two payments: one to our client and the attorney fees covered by the manufacturer. The owner retained possession of the vehicle.

Systems Involved

  • Engine
  • Electrical
  • Fuel
🔧
6
Repair Attempts
📅
45
Days Out of Service
🚗
2,251
Miles at First Repair
✓
$21,000
Recovered
Repair History

2025 Ram 1500 Repair History: What the Repair Orders Show

Visit 1: April 29-May 15, 2025

  • The owner reported that the trailer turn signals were not working and a dashboard error message appeared while reversing, even without a trailer attached.
  • A technician confirmed an internal electrical fault in the Trailer Tow Module (ITCM). This fault caused a constant short circuit to the battery for the right trailer lamp.
  • After inspecting the wiring and verifying the diagnostic trouble codes, the technician determined the module was faulty and replaced it to resolve the issue.

Visit 2: August 11, 2025

  • A technician investigated reports that the trailer running lights were not functioning despite the trailer working correctly with other vehicles.
  • Although specific fault codes (B166E-13 and B166E-12) related to the trailer tow lamp control circuit were initially pulled during a test drive.
  • Using a specialized trailer test tool, they verified that all lights were operating as designed and found no substandard conditions at that time.
  • Consequently, the dealership recommended that the owner inspect their trailer's own wiring and connectors for potential issues.

Visit 3: September 10, 2025

  • The technician addressed two separate issues reported by the owner.
  • First, a check engine light caused by fuel pressure sensor performance code P018B-00 was addressed with a required Powertrain Control Module (PCM) software update under Technical Service Bulletin 18-031-25 Rev A.
  • After a successful road test, the diagnostic codes did not return.
  • Second, for the "Warning Light Illumination Unavailable" message and related dashboard faults, the technician identified a known performance issue with the instrument panel cluster.
  • According to STAR Publication S2508000042 Rev B, a official software fix is scheduled for release late in the 3rd quarter of 2025 (or already released depending on specific vehicle production dates in 2026), and no physical repairs are currently authorized for this condition.

Visit 4: November 10-11, 2025

  • The technician addressed two related concerns regarding a check engine light (CEL) and an instrument cluster/radio failure.
  • The CEL was suspected to be related to a loss of communication with the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC), which was confirmed by a U0155-00 diagnostic trouble code (DTC) stored in multiple modules.
  • This communication error stemmed from a separate incident where the owner reported a blank cluster and radio screen, flashing shifter lights, and an inability to shift into gear.
  • The technician diagnosed the root cause of this system failure as a failed auxiliary battery, which failed a load test after being charged.
  • The faulty auxiliary battery was replaced.
  • After the repair, all components functioned correctly during testing.
  • A technical publication indicated that while the system failure was resolved by the new battery, a persistent issue with the cluster display going blank or resetting is a known engineering concern, with a software update estimated to be available by the fourth quarter of 2025.

Visit 5: December 1-2, 2025

  • The owner reported that the Active Lane Management system was not working despite all settings being enabled.
  • A technician inspected the vehicle's software levels, finding the CVADAS and CADM modules were at their latest available software versions.
  • After verifying the issue on a road test (ACC worked but lane lines did not appear and no Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) were present), the technician reset the CADM and performed a forward-facing camera drive calibration.
  • The vehicle passed the calibration, the DTCs generated during the process were cleared, and a subsequent road test confirmed that the Active Lane Management system was operational.
  • The system remained functional even after an overnight bus sleep cycle; this indicated the calibration successfully resolved the issue.

Visit 6: December 15, 2025–Present

  • This is an ongoing repair, the owner had their vehicle towed in after it began smoking severely from the tailpipes while driving down from Flagstaff.
  • The vehicle has a massive oil leak that is dumping directly into the exhaust system, creating a significant hazard.
  • Due to the severity of the leak and the risk of engine damage or fire, the vehicle must not be started until it undergoes a full inspection and repair.
Legal Analysis

Can a 2025 Ram 1500 Be a Lemon in Arizona?

Arizona Lemon Law (Ariz. Rev. Stat. §44-1261 to §44-1267) covers new motor vehicles purchased or leased in Arizona for personal, family, or household purposes.

  • Repair attempts: 4 repair attempts for the same defect
  • Days out of service: 30 cumulative calendar days
  • Remedies: Replacement vehicle or full refund (minus reasonable use allowance)
  • Attorney fees: Yes - manufacturer pays consumer's attorney fees if consumer prevails
This case: The dealer had this Ram 1500 in 6 times; it was out of service for 45 days. The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act also applies to written warranties nationwide. Our client paid $0 out of pocket†.
Our Approach

How Was This Ram 1500 Lemon Law Claim Resolved?

1

Free Case Review

Our first step was a count: how many times the Ram 1500 went in, and how many days it stayed.

2

Building the File

The file listed each repair in order: the complaint, the diagnosis, the fix. Laid out that way, the repeat problems were plain to see.

3

Demand to Ram

Next came a written demand to Ram. It laid out the repair history and asked for a buyback.

4

Cash and Keep

Ram agreed to resolve it with a cash-and-keep settlement, $21,000 in total. Our client paid nothing out of pocket† for the legal work.

Case Status

$21,000 Cash and Keep Secured

$21,000
Cash and Keep: Client Kept the Vehicle

Key Case Facts

  • Vehicle: 2025 Ram 1500
  • Purchased in: Arizona
  • Status at purchase: New
  • Mileage at first repair: 2,251 miles
  • Systems involved: Engine, Electrical, Fuel
  • Repair attempts: 6 visits
  • Days out of service: 45 days
  • Manufacturer: Ram
  • Settlement type: Cash and Keep
  • Settlement amount: $21,000 (Cash and Keep)
Client Reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying

Legal Team

Attorney on Record

Steven Nassi, Esq. - Managing Partner

Steven Nassi, Esq.

Managing Partner, Easy Lemon by RockPoint Law P.C.

Licensed attorney whose practice is limited to lemon law. Steven leads the Easy Lemon legal team and has overseen thousands of successful lemon law claims against major manufacturers including Audi, Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and more.

Having Problems With Your Ram 1500?

Same Ram 1500 problem, another dealer visit? You may have a Arizona lemon law claim. Check in 30 seconds, free.

Qualify in 30 Seconds →
Common Questions

2025 Ram 1500 Lemon Law Questions in Arizona

What are the Arizona lemon law standards for a Ram 1500?
In Arizona, the test is 4 repair attempts for the same defect, or 30 cumulative calendar days out of service (the Arizona Lemon Law, Ariz. Rev. Stat. §44-1261 to §44-1267). Remedies: Replacement vehicle or full refund (minus reasonable use allowance). The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act also applies to written warranties in every state.
How much did this Arizona Ram 1500 case recover?
$21,000, paid as a cash-and-keep settlement. That figure includes our client's payment and the attorney fees Ram paid. Results may vary. Prior outcomes do not guarantee a similar result.
Buyback or cash and keep: what is the difference?
A cash-and-keep settlement leaves the vehicle with the owner and pays cash. A buyback returns the vehicle to the manufacturer, which pays off the loan or lease and refunds the owner, less any use allowance permitted by state law.
Is there a fee to hire Easy Lemon for a Ram 1500 claim?
Nothing upfront. Fee-shifting statutes in lemon law cases generally put attorney fees on the manufacturer, and this client paid nothing out of pocket†.
Ram Owner?

Ram Problems Like These Can Qualify

Repeat trips to the shop for one problem can mean a lemon law claim. You pay no attorney fees; the manufacturer does. Ram cases like this one are a regular part of our work.

See Our Ram Lemon Law Page →
Check If I Qualify → (855) 435-3666
INSTANT QUALIFICATION
100% Free & Confidential · Takes 30 Seconds
Vehicle Situation Contact

What's your vehicle? 🚗

Let's see if your car qualifies for a lemon law claim.

🔒 Lemon law claims have strict filing deadlines, don't wait.
$50M+**
Recovered
97%*
Resolution Rate
No Attorney’s Fees†
Unless We Recover
★★★★★§
Client Rating