2023 Ford F-150 Lemon Law Case Study
A 2023 Ford F-150 That Spent More Time at the Dealer Than on the Road
Our client purchased a 2023 Ford F-150 in Tennessee with just 577 miles on the odometer — practically new. Within about a year of ownership, the truck had visited the dealer four separate times for escalating mechanical failures that Ford repeatedly failed to fix: a malfunctioning cylinder deactivation solenoid, a 4WD system fault that made the truck undrivable in four-wheel drive, and a catastrophic cam timing failure requiring replacement of the intake camshaft, cam phasers, and related hardware.
By the time our client reached out to Easy Lemon, the F-150 had accumulated over 110 cumulative days out of service — more than triple Tennessee's lemon law threshold — across four documented repair attempts at the dealership. Ford Motor Company had every opportunity to make it right. They didn't.
Easy Lemon evaluated the case, built a demand citing Tennessee's lemon law statute and federal Magnuson-Moss warranty protections, and secured a $20,000 cash settlement. Our client kept the truck — now with a new cam assembly and battery — and received $20,000 in cash compensation. Ford paid all attorney fees.
Defects Documented in This Case
- Check Engine Light — DTC P3426 (Cylinder Deactivation Solenoid Fault) — the F-150's cylinder deactivation system, designed to switch between 4- and 8-cylinder mode for fuel efficiency, failed and triggered a CEL; solenoid 4 on the right-hand side under the valve cover was replaced
- 4WD Fault — DTC C06A2 (Front IWE Failure) — the Integrated Wheel End (IWE) hub engagement system, responsible for engaging front-wheel drive in 4WD mode, failed; the right front IWE assembly was replaced, but the underlying 4WD system continued to exhibit issues
- Check Engine Light — DTCs P0340, P0344 & P0022 (Cam Timing / Cam Phaser Failure) — persistent rattling on cold starts escalated to a cam timing failure; the bank 2 intake camshaft and both left and right intake cam phasers (variable valve timing actuators) were replaced along with related gaskets and hardware
- Electrical / Battery Failure — during the extended third repair visit, the truck failed to start on July 28 and required a jump; the battery was replaced
- Recurring Slow-Start and Idle Vibration — a fourth repair visit in late August documented continued slow-starting behavior similar to a weak battery and vibration at idle, consistent with underlying engine concerns that remained unresolved
Four Trips to the Dealer. Four Failures. 110+ Days Without Their Truck.
The F-150 was purchased at Ford of Murfreesboro, Tennessee in February 2024. Within a year, the truck had cycled through four dealer visits covering engine, 4WD, cam timing, and electrical failures — none fully resolved before the next one began.
Repair Visit 1 — March 7–25, 2025 (19 Days)
The Check Engine Light came on. Dealership technicians diagnosed fault code P3426 — a cylinder deactivation solenoid failure on the right-hand bank. Solenoid 4, located under the valve cover, was replaced. The F-150 was out of service for 19 days. This type of failure is common in Ford's multi-displacement engines and often recurs if the underlying oil pressure or control circuit issues are not addressed.
Repair Visit 2 — April 17 – May 2, 2025 (16 Days)
Weeks after getting the truck back, our client reported noise while driving and a "4WD Fault" message on the dashboard. The truck's four-wheel drive system was malfunctioning. Technicians pulled fault code C06A2 — indicating failure of the right front Integrated Wheel End (IWE) hub, the vacuum-operated component that locks the front axle shafts into 4WD. The IWE assembly and related hardware were replaced. The truck was down for another 16 days.
Repair Visit 3 — June 3 – July 31, 2025 (59 Days)
The longest and most serious repair began in early June. The truck was rattling on cold starts — a classic early symptom of cam phaser or timing chain wear — and the CEL returned. This time the codes were P0340 (cam position sensor — bank 1, sensor A), P0344 (cam position sensor — intermittent), and P0022 (cam timing over-retarded, intake, bank 2). Ford's diagnosis: the bank 2 intake camshaft had failed, along with both left and right intake cam phasers (variable valve timing actuators). The cam, phasers, gaskets, and supporting hardware were all replaced. Then — on July 28, with the truck nearly ready — it refused to start. A jump was required and the battery was replaced. Total: 59 days out of service for this single visit.
Repair Visit 4 — August 25 – September 9, 2025 (16 Days)
The final documented repair visit began just three weeks after the F-150 was returned from its 59-day stay. Our client reported slow starting behavior similar to a weak battery and vibration at idle — symptoms consistent with the same underlying engine issues that had driven the prior visits. The truck was back in the shop for 16 more days. No clear resolution was documented. At this point, Easy Lemon was engaged and the legal process began.
Why This F-150 Clearly Qualified — And Why Ford Still Had to Be Pushed
The 2023 Ford F-150 qualified under Tennessee's lemon law on multiple independent grounds. Tennessee Code Annotated § 55-24-101 et seq. provides protection when a nonconformity substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of a vehicle and the manufacturer or dealer fails to repair it after a reasonable number of attempts. This case satisfied both primary qualifying paths:
- Repair attempt threshold: 4 documented repair visits for overlapping engine, drivetrain, and electrical defects — meeting or exceeding Tennessee's reasonable attempt standard
- Days-out-of-service threshold: 110+ cumulative days out of service — more than triple the 30-day threshold — within the first year and a half of ownership
Beyond Tennessee's state statute, the case was further strengthened by the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.), which provides an independent path to recovery for repeated warranty failures on consumer products. Magnuson-Moss is particularly powerful because it allows attorney fee awards against manufacturers — giving Easy Lemon additional negotiating leverage beyond the state statute alone.
Why Ford Still Required Professional Representation
Despite four documented repair visits and 110+ days out of service, Ford Motor Company did not voluntarily offer fair compensation. Several factors made professional lemon law representation critical in this case:
- Multiple defect defense: Ford may have argued that the engine, 4WD, and electrical issues were separate, unrelated defects rather than a pattern of nonconformity — a common tactic to avoid meeting the repair attempt threshold. Easy Lemon countered by demonstrating that the cumulative days-out-of-service threshold was independently satisfied, regardless of defect categorization
- "Repaired" defense: After each visit, Ford marked the truck as repaired. Easy Lemon documented the continuous cycle of returns to establish the overall pattern of failure and the fact that each repair brought a new failure
- Settlement valuation: Consumers who negotiate directly with Ford frequently accept nominal goodwill payments far below the value of their claim. Our knowledge of Tennessee's statute and Magnuson-Moss fee-shifting drove a significantly stronger negotiating position
How Easy Lemon Recovered $20,000 for This Case
Free Case Evaluation
We reviewed all four repair orders, tallied 110+ cumulative days out of service, and confirmed that both Tennessee's state lemon law threshold and Magnuson-Moss warranty protections applied. We also confirmed the truck was within the statutory coverage window — 110+ days in the shop starting within the first 18 months of ownership — and that the defects materially impaired the vehicle's use and value.
Documentation & Case Assembly
Our team compiled the complete case record: the purchase contract, all four repair orders documenting the repair dates and diagnoses, records of the 110+ cumulative service days, and the history of fault codes (P3426, C06A2, P0340, P0344, P0022) demonstrating a pattern of escalating powertrain and drivetrain failures. We flagged the particularly strong cam timing failure documentation — a known systemic issue on this engine generation — as a central element of our demand.
Formal Demand to Ford Motor Company
We filed a formal demand under Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-24-101 et seq. and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, citing the four repair attempts, the 110+ days of cumulative downtime, and the substantial impairment of the vehicle's use, value, and safety. The demand made clear that Ford faced attorney fee exposure under both the Tennessee statute and Magnuson-Moss if the matter escalated to arbitration or litigation.
Settlement Negotiation — $20,000
Armed with clear statutory eligibility and fee-shifting exposure, we negotiated a $20,000 cash settlement — Cash and Keep, allowing our client to retain the F-150 with all completed repairs, while receiving $20,000 in cash compensation. No arbitration. No litigation. Zero cost to our client. Ford paid all attorney fees.
Why This Ford F-150 Qualified as a Lemon
Tennessee's Lemon Law (Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-24-101 et seq.) sets specific thresholds that entitle a consumer to a buyback or replacement. This case satisfied multiple criteria:
- Cylinder Deactivation Solenoid (P3426): Required multiple repair attempts without permanent resolution.
- 4WD IWE Failure (C06A2): Required multiple repair attempts without permanent resolution.
- Cam Phaser / Cam Timing Failure (P0022, P0340, P0344): Required multiple repair attempts without permanent resolution.
- Battery Failure: Required multiple repair attempts without permanent resolution.
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act eligible: Federal warranty protection provided additional remedies.
$20,000 Recovered for Our Client
Case Summary
- Vehicle: 2023 Ford F-150 — purchased in Tennessee
- Purchase date: February 13, 2024
- Dealership: Ford of Murfreesboro, Tennessee
- Primary defects: Cylinder deactivation solenoid failure (P3426), 4WD front IWE failure (C06A2), cam timing / cam phaser failure (P0340, P0344, P0022), battery failure
- Total repair visits: 4 documented dealer repair visits
- Cumulative days out of service: 110+ days (19 + 16 + 59 + 16)
- Tennessee lemon law threshold: 30 days and/or 4 repair attempts — both exceeded
- Settlement type: Cash and Keep — $20,000 cash recovery, client retains the F-150
- Cost to client: $0 — Ford Motor Company paid all attorney fees
Results may vary. Prior outcomes do not guarantee a similar result. Each case is unique and depends on its specific facts and applicable law. Attorney advertising. Easy Lemon® by RockPoint Law P.C.
What Our Clients Are Saying
Attorney on Record
Steven Nassi, Esq.
Managing Partner — Easy Lemon by RockPoint Law P.C.
Licensed attorney specializing exclusively in lemon law across all 50 states. Steven leads the Easy Lemon legal team and has overseen thousands of successful lemon law settlements against major manufacturers including Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota, BMW, Tesla, and more.
Having Problems With Your Ford F-150?
If your F-150 has been in the shop repeatedly — or spent 30 or more cumulative days in service — you may have a lemon law claim. Get a free evaluation in 30 seconds.
Qualify in 30 Seconds →